Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 6, 2021; 9(34): 10626-10637
Published online Dec 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i34.10626
Published online Dec 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i34.10626
Table 2 Sensitivity analyses: The effect of potential biases on primary and secondary outcomes
Potential bias or limitations excluded | IPC RR (95%CI), I2 | IPH RR (95%CI), I2 | IPOST within 24 h RR (95%CI), I2 | VAS of POST at 1 h RR (95%CI), I2 | VAS of POST at 24 h RR (95% CI), I2 |
Overall | 0.38 (0.23, 0.63), 82% | 0.38 (0.21, 0.69), 74% | 0.19 (0.09, 0.41), 0% | -18.30 (-22.79, -13.82), 73% | -14.86 (-15.75, -13.98), 43% |
Only females | 0.33 (0.20, 0.52), 69% | NE | NE | ||
Cuff prefilling | 0.35 (0.19, 0.63), 85% | NE | NE | -17.59 (-18.69, -16.49), 77% | -14.81 (-17.22, -12.41), 54% |
A high risk of bias | NE | NE | 0.19 (0.08, 0.48), 0% | -18.45 (-25.61, -11.29), 77% | -14.37 (-18.31, -10.43), 56% |
- Citation: Chen ZX, Shi Z, Wang B, Zhang Y. Intracuff alkalinized lidocaine to prevent postoperative airway complications: A meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(34): 10626-10637
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i34/10626.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i34.10626