Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 6, 2021; 9(34): 10595-10603
Published online Dec 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i34.10595
Published online Dec 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i34.10595
Table 2 Comparison of the hemodynamic parameter between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Indicators | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 |
HR (times/min) | ||||
Remimazolam group (n = 40) | 76.7 ± 7.1 | 68.3 ± 6.5 | 66.8 ± 5.9 | 78.8 ± 6.6 |
Propofol group (n = 40) | 78.2 ± 7.7 | 66.7 ± 6.7 | 65.1 ± 6.0 | 80.5 ± 7.3 |
t value | -0.906 | 1.091 | 1.278 | -1.093 |
P value | 0.368 | 0.279 | 0.205 | 0.278 |
MAP (mmHg) | ||||
Remimazolam group (n = 40) | 98.4 ± 5.3 | 88.3 ± 4.7 | 86.7 ± 4.2 | 102.1 ± 4.8 |
Propofol group (n = 40) | 99.6 ± 4.7 | 86.0 ± 4.4 | 83.8 ± 4.5 | 103.8 ± 4.2 |
t value | -1.071 | 2.259 | 2.980 | -1.686 |
P value | 0.287 | 0.027 | 0.004 | 0.096 |
CI (L/min·m2) | ||||
Remimazolam group (n = 40) | 3.67 ± 0.62 | 3.52 ± 0.52 | 3.58 ± 0.48 | 3.57 ± 0.53 |
Propofol group (n = 40) | 3.80 ± 0.60 | 3.40 ± 0.48 | 3.51 ± 0.50 | 3.65 ± 0.49 |
t value | -0.953 | 1.072 | 0.639 | -0.701 |
P value | 0.344 | 0.287 | 0.525 | 0.485 |
SVI (mL/m2·bpm) | ||||
Remimazolam group (n = 40) | 47.83 ± 5.81 | 43.80 ± 5.26 | 41.94 ± 5.57 | 45.80 ± 5.16 |
Propofol group (n = 40) | 49.20 ± 5.63 | 40.38 ± 4.95 | 38.53 ± 4.86 | 43.73 ± 5.57 |
t value | -1.071 | 2.995 | 2.918 | 1.724 |
P value | 0.287 | 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.089 |
- Citation: Tang F, Yi JM, Gong HY, Lu ZY, Chen J, Fang B, Chen C, Liu ZY. Remimazolam benzenesulfonate anesthesia effectiveness in cardiac surgery patients under general anesthesia. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(34): 10595-10603
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i34/10595.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i34.10595