Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 16, 2021; 9(32): 9792-9803
Published online Nov 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i32.9792
Table 2 High-resolution computerized tomography signs
HRCT findings
Mutant EGFR group (n = 31)
Wild-type group (n = 67)
P value
Nodule size (mm)17.19 ± 6.7914.37 ± 6.300.047a
Pure GGNs
Nodule size (mm)12.79 ± 5.249.24 ± 3.260.042a
Partial solid nodules
Nodule size (mm)18.63 ± 6.4716.68 ± 6.050.216
Proportion of ground-glass component (%)56.10 ± 24.0151.05 ± 28.130.457
Nodule morphology0.137
Round-like/ovoid14 (45.2%)41 (61.2%)
Irregular17 (54.8%)26 (38.8%)
Spicules on the edge of the nodule20 (64.5%)34 (50.7%)0.202
Lobules on the border of the nodule29 (93.5%)61 (91.0%)1.000
Vacuole/honeycomb sign25 (80.6%)36 (53.7%)0.011a
Pleural indentation20 (64.5%)33 (49.3%)0.159
Relationship with bronchus/bronchovascular bundles0.613
Bronchus truncated in the nodule1 (3.2%)6 (9.0%)
Bronchus continuous in the nodule, with dilation or twisted appearance11 (35.5%)20 (29.9%)
Bronchus continuous in the nodule, without dilation or twisted appearance7 (22.6%)11 (16.4%)
Bronchus not associated with ground-glass shadows12 (38.7%)30 (44.8%)
Relationship with blood vessels0.488
Blood vessels closely packed around the nodule with adherent-like pattern0 (0.0%)3 (4.5%)
Blood vessels closely packed within the nodule20 (64.5%)41 (61.2%)
Vascular clustering around the nodule11 (35.5%)23 (34.3%)