Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 26, 2021; 9(3): 736-747
Published online Jan 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i3.736
Published online Jan 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i3.736
No. | Gender | Age in yr | Number of gallstones | Diameter of gallstones, mm | Thickness of gallbladder wall, mm | Cystic duct diameter, mm | Cystic duct length, mm | Cystic duct direction | Number of choledocholithiasis | Diameter of common bile duct, mm | Diameter of choledocholithiasis, mm | Dilating the cystic duct | |||
1 | Male | 66 | 3 | 13 | 5.6 | 6 | 2.9 | Right | 16 | 13 | 13 | Yes | |||
2 | Female | 28 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 3.5 | Right | 6 | 16.3 | 6 | No | |||
3 | Female | 31 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 2.5 | Right | 4 | 15 | 5 | Yes | |||
4 | Male | 43 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | Dorsal | 3 | 12 | 5 | No | |||
5 | Female | 41 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | Right | 1 | 10 | 7 | No | |||
6 | Male | 59 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 2.7 | Dorsal | 2 | 11 | 9 | Yes |
- Citation: He YG, Gao MF, Li J, Peng XH, Tang YC, Huang XB, Li YM. Cystic duct dilation through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for treatment of gallstones and choledocholithiasis: Six case reports and review of literature. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(3): 736-747
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i3/736.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i3.736