Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2021; 9(27): 8051-8060
Published online Sep 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8051
Published online Sep 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8051
Table 3 Comparison of vascular recanalization between the two groups, n (%)
| Group | n | Grade 0 | Grade 1 | Grade 2a | Grade 2b | Grade 3 | Vascular recanalization |
| Direct thrombectomy group | 48 | 2 (4.17) | 3 (6.25) | 5 (10.42) | 18 (37.50) | 20 (41.67) | 38 (79.17) |
| Bridging treatment group | 48 | 0 (0.00) | 4 (8.33) | 8 (16.67) | 17 (35.42) | 19 (39.58) | 36 (75.00) |
| χ2 | 0.236 | ||||||
| P value | 0.627 |
- Citation: Ding HJ, Ma C, Ye FP, Zhang JF. Bridging therapy and direct mechanical thrombectomy in the treatment of cardiogenic cerebral infarction with anterior circulation macrovascular occlusion. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(27): 8051-8060
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i27/8051.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8051