Comparison of different methods of nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients: A meta-analysis

doi:10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7772

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 9, Issue 26

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (4999)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-6) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

260

WORD

100

HTML

2613

Figures (1-6)

212

Tables (1-2)

255

Sum=3440

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

338

Download

504

Sum=842

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

195

Download

522

Sum=717

Sep 16, 2021 (publication date) through Nov 4, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (2)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2021; 9(26): 7772-7785
Published online Sep 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7772

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 6 Comparison between the conventional nasogastric tube placement technique and video-assisted placement in terms of successful first and overall insertions. RR: Relative risk; CI: Confidence interval.

Citation: Ou GW, Li H, Shao B, Huang LM, Chen GM, Li WC. Comparison of different methods of nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients: A meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(26): 7772-7785
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i26/7772.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7772