Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2021; 9(26): 7772-7785
Published online Sep 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7772
Published online Sep 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7772
Table 2 Summary of findings based on the pooling of available literature
| Techniques compared/outcomes | Success on 1st insertion | Overall success of insertion |
| Reverse Sellick’s maneuver vs conventional technique | RR 1.94; 95%CI: 1.62-2.31 | RR 1.26; 95%CI: 1.04-1.52 |
| Neck flexion with lateral neck pressure vs conventional technique | RR 1.64; 95%CI: 1.10-2.45 | RR 1.26; 95%CI: 1.05-1.52 |
| Frozen nasogastric tube vs conventional technique | RR 1.55; 95%CI: 1.13-2.13 | RR 1.32; 95%CI: 1.13-1.54 |
| Endotracheal tube-guided vs conventional technique | RR 1.88; 95%CI: 1.52-2.32 | RR 1.52; 95% CI: 1.29-1.79 |
| Video-assisted vs conventional technique | RR 1.60; 95%CI: 1.31-1.95 | RR 1.41; 95%CI: 1.20-1.64 |
- Citation: Ou GW, Li H, Shao B, Huang LM, Chen GM, Li WC. Comparison of different methods of nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients: A meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(26): 7772-7785
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i26/7772.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7772