Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2021; 9(26): 7671-7681
Published online Sep 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7671
Published online Sep 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7671
Table 5 Risk factors for common bile duct stone recurrence
Factor | β | OR (95%CI) | P value | β | OR (95%CI) | P value |
PAD | 0.55 | 1.74 (0.61-4.95) | 0.30 | |||
Procedure time | 0.01 | 1.01 (0.98-1.03) | 0.84 | |||
CBD diameter ≥ 1.5 cm | 1.82 | 6.15 (1.87-20.24) | < 0.01 | |||
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
CBD morphology | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | ||||
Straight type | Reference | -1.60 | 0.20 (0.06-0.70) | 0.01 | ||
S type | 2.82 | 16.79 (4.27-66.09) | < 0.01 | 1.22 | 3.38 (1.07-10.72) | 0.04 |
Polyline type | 1.60 | 4.97 (1.42-17.38) | 0.01 | Reference |
- Citation: Ji X, Jia W, Zhao Q, Wang Y, Ma SR, Xu L, Kan Y, Cao Y, Fan BJ, Yang Z. Common bile duct morphology is associated with recurrence of common bile duct stones in Billroth II anatomy patients. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(26): 7671-7681
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i26/7671.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7671