Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2021; 9(24): 7022-7031
Published online Aug 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i24.7022
Published online Aug 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i24.7022
Group | Fixed, n = 16 | Unfixed, n = 22 | P value |
Sex, n (%) | 0.052 | ||
Male | 4 (25) | 13 (59.1) | |
Female | 12 (75) | 9 (40.9) | |
Age (yr) | 54.0 ± 16.0 | 51.4 ± 13.2 | 0.59 |
Radius fracture, n (%) | 0.19 | ||
B1 | 1 (6.3) | 2 (9.1) | |
B3 | 4 (25) | 8 (36.4) | |
C1 | 3 (18.7) | 0 (0) | |
C2 | 0 (0) | 2 (9.1) | |
C3 | 8 (50) | 10 (45.5) | |
Imaging features | AO classification | AO classification | |
Reduction and fixation of the VMLF fragments, n (%) | Fix with screws or sutures | Fracture is small and not fixed | |
Fixed with AO distal radius volar locking plates | 14 (87.5) | 18 (81.8) | 0.582 |
Volar and dorsal locking plates | 2 (12.5) | 1 (4.5) | 0.582 |
Dorsal locking plate | 0 (0) | 1 (4.5) | 1.0 |
Locking plates and ancillary fixation with Kirschner wires or screws | 0 (0) | 2 (9.1) | 0.4993 |
External fixation with plaster | 6 (37.5) | 11 (50) | 0.6638 |
- Citation: Meng H, Yan JZ, Wang B, Ma ZB, Kang WB, Liu BG. Influence of volar margin of the lunate fossa fragment fixation on distal radius fracture outcomes: A retrospective series. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(24): 7022-7031
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i24/7022.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i24.7022