Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2021; 9(22): 6308-6318
Published online Aug 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i22.6308
Published online Aug 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i22.6308
Table 4 Differences of results of the two cardiopulmonary exercise tests of patients in the two groups
Changes of the two tests | ||
Control group (n = 30) | Exercise group (n = 30) | |
Exercise time (min) | 1.13 ± 1.69 | 3.41 ± 2.88b |
Anaerobic threshold (mL/min) | 252.13 ± 233.66 | 405.36 ± 207.89a |
Metabolic equivalent at anaerobic threshold | 0.82 ± 0.71 | 1.46 ± 0.82b |
Peak oxygen uptake (mL/min) | 232.73 ± 254.96 | 402.88 ± 258.35a |
Peak metabolic equivalent | 0.77 ± 0.86 | 1.49 ± 0.93b |
- Citation: Cai M, Wang L, Ren YL. Effect of exercise training on left ventricular remodeling in patients with myocardial infarction and possible mechanisms. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(22): 6308-6318
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i22/6308.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i22.6308