Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2021; 9(20): 5479-5489
Published online Jul 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5479
Published online Jul 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5479
WNJT group, n = 49 | Nasal cannula group, n = 52 | P value | |
Lowest SpO2 during gastroscopy | 95.5 ± 4.3 | 90.0 ± 7.0 | 0.000 |
Airway opening maneuvers | 7 (14.3) | 36 (69.2) | 0.000 |
Facemask ventilation | 0 (0) | 4 (7.7) | 0.118 |
Body movement | 7 (14.3) | 5 (9.6) | 0.468 |
Cough | 5 (10.2) | 4 (7.7) | 0.926 |
Epistaxis (0/1/2/3) | 0/2/1/0 (6.1) | 0/0/0/0 (0) | 0.111 |
Sore throat | 2 (4.1) | 1 (1.9) | 0.610 |
-
Citation: Shao LJZ, Hong FX, Liu FK, Wan L, Xue FS. Prospective, randomized comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastro
scopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(20): 5479-5489 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i20/5479.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5479