Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2021; 9(20): 5398-5407
Published online Jul 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5398
Published online Jul 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5398
AHPBA classification[20] | NCCN classification[20] | JPS classification[18] | |
VenousPV/SMV | |||
Contact or encasement | Contact > 180 or ≤ 180 with contour irregularity or thrombosis of the vein | SMV/PV: Tumor contact/invasion of 180° or more/occlusion not exceeding the inferior border of the duodenum. | |
Short venous segment occlusion | |||
Reconstructible | Reconstructible | SMA, CA, CHA: No tumor contact/invasion. | |
Arterial | |||
SMA | Contact ≤ 180° | Contact ≤ 180° | SMA, CA: Tumor contact/invasion of less than 180° without stenosis/deformity. |
CHA | Direct contact | Contact without extension to CA or HA bifurcation | CHA: Tumor contact/invasion without showing tumor. |
Short segment encasement | |||
CA | No contact | Contact ≤ 180° | Contact/invasion of the PHA and/or CA. (In case of contact/invasion to both portal vein and peripancreatic arteries, it was graded as BR-A.) |
Contact > 180° without contact of aorta/uninvolved GDA |
- Citation: Mikulic D, Mrzljak A. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and vascular resections in the era of neoadjuvant therapy. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(20): 5398-5407
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i20/5398.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5398