Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 16, 2021; 9(2): 357-371
Published online Jan 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i2.357
Published online Jan 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i2.357
Table 1 Methodological quality assessment of eligible studies using Newcastle–Ottawa scale
Ref. | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | |||||||
Representativeness of exposed cohort | Selection of nonexposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | Adjust for the most important risk factors | Adjust for other risk factors | Assessment of outcome | Follow-up length | Loss to follow-up rate | Total quality score | |
Postoperative limb length | Preoperative limb length | TKA | Limb lengthening/LLD | Age, sex, BMI | Varus/valgus deformity, KL grade etc. | Limb length change | Any postoperative period | < 20% | ||
Vaidya et al[11], 2010 | + | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | 7 (moderate risk) |
Lang et al[12], 2012 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 9 (low risk) |
Chang et al[13], 2013 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 9 (low risk) |
Tipton et al[14], 2015 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 9 (low risk) |
Kim et al[4], 2015 | + | + | + | - | + | + | - | + | + | 7 (moderate risk) |
Goldstein et al[15], 2016 | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | 8 (moderate risk) |
Chinnappa et al[16], 2017 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 9 (low risk) |
Hinarejos et al[17], 2020 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 9 (low risk) |
- Citation: Tripathy SK, Pradhan SS, Varghese P, Purudappa PP, Velagada S, Goyal T, Panda BB, Vanyambadi J. Limb length discrepancy after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(2): 357-371
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i2/357.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i2.357