Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 16, 2021; 9(2): 357-371
Published online Jan 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i2.357
Table 1 Methodological quality assessment of eligible studies using Newcastle–Ottawa scale
Ref.
Selection
Comparability
Outcome

Representativeness of exposed cohortSelection of nonexposed cohortAscertainment of exposureDemonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of studyAdjust for the most important risk factorsAdjust for other risk factorsAssessment of outcomeFollow-up lengthLoss to follow-up rateTotal quality score
Postoperative limb lengthPreoperative limb lengthTKALimb lengthening/LLDAge, sex, BMIVarus/valgus deformity, KL grade etc.Limb length changeAny postoperative period< 20%
Vaidya et al[11], 2010++++--+++7 (moderate risk)
Lang et al[12], 2012+++++++++9 (low risk)
Chang et al[13], 2013+++++++++9 (low risk)
Tipton et al[14], 2015+++++++++9 (low risk)
Kim et al[4], 2015+++-++-++7 (moderate risk)
Goldstein et al[15], 2016++++++-++8 (moderate risk)
Chinnappa et al[16], 2017+++++++++9 (low risk)
Hinarejos et al[17], 2020+++++++++9 (low risk)