Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2021; 9(18): 4573-4584
Published online Jun 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i18.4573
Published online Jun 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i18.4573
Table 2 Some data samples used for feature selection
| ID | Expected age at delivery | AFP concentration | hCGb concentration | uE3 concentration | Body weight | Gestational age | Result |
| 783 | 19.633 | 23.22 | 30.71 | 5.35 | 60.7 | 17.6 | 1 |
| 1504 | 39.403 | 44.1 | 30.41 | 3.87 | 62 | 16.4 | 1 |
| 4338 | 30.527 | 23.73 | 26.29 | 5.86 | 65 | 18.5 | 1 |
| 6050 | 34.489 | 11.53 | 52.42 | 9.8 | 52.5 | 20.6 | 1 |
| 6412 | 41.966 | 24.51 | 49.67 | 3.91 | 58 | 19 | 1 |
- Citation: Zhang HG, Jiang YT, Dai SD, Li L, Hu XN, Liu RZ. Application of intelligent algorithms in Down syndrome screening during second trimester pregnancy. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(18): 4573-4584
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i18/4573.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i18.4573