Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2021; 9(17): 4166-4177
Published online Jun 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i17.4166
Table 3 Compared results between the experienced and less-experienced endoscopists in each primary cannulation technique

Conventional technique with sphincterotomy
NKF

Experienced (n = 147) (%)
Less-experienced (n = 228) (%)
P value
Experienced (n = 90) (%)
Less-experienced (n = 77) (%)
P value
Success rate361/375 (96.3)161/167 (96.4)0.936
144/147 (98.0)217/228 (95.2)0.16688/90 (97.8)73/77 (94.8)0.306
Cannulation time (min)4.8 ± 3.54.8 ± 3.20.951
5.1 ± 3.54.6 ± 3.60.2004.2 ± 3.15.5 ± 3.10.010a
Total procedure time (min)17.2 ± 9.215.2 ± 8.20.019a
17.6 ± 9.616.9 ± 8.90.49014.9 ± 8.415.6 ± 8.00.598
Post-ERCP pancreatitis25 (6.7)4 (2.4)0.040a
5 (3.4)20 (8.9)0.039a1 (1.1)3 (3.9)0.243
Hyperamylasemia52 (14.0)13 (7.8)0.041a
15 (10.2)37 (16.4)0.0905 (5.6)9 (11.7)0.156
Bleeding10 (2.7)6 (3.6)0.568
2 (1.4)8 (3.6)0.2022 (2.2)4 (5.2)0.306
Perforation1 (0.3)0 (0)0.505
0 (0)1 (0.4)0.4230 (0)0 (0)NA