Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2021; 9(17): 4166-4177
Published online Jun 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i17.4166
Published online Jun 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i17.4166
Table 3 Compared results between the experienced and less-experienced endoscopists in each primary cannulation technique
Conventional technique with sphincterotomy | NKF | |||||
Experienced (n = 147) (%) | Less-experienced (n = 228) (%) | P value | Experienced (n = 90) (%) | Less-experienced (n = 77) (%) | P value | |
Success rate | 361/375 (96.3) | 161/167 (96.4) | 0.936 | |||
144/147 (98.0) | 217/228 (95.2) | 0.166 | 88/90 (97.8) | 73/77 (94.8) | 0.306 | |
Cannulation time (min) | 4.8 ± 3.5 | 4.8 ± 3.2 | 0.951 | |||
5.1 ± 3.5 | 4.6 ± 3.6 | 0.200 | 4.2 ± 3.1 | 5.5 ± 3.1 | 0.010a | |
Total procedure time (min) | 17.2 ± 9.2 | 15.2 ± 8.2 | 0.019a | |||
17.6 ± 9.6 | 16.9 ± 8.9 | 0.490 | 14.9 ± 8.4 | 15.6 ± 8.0 | 0.598 | |
Post-ERCP pancreatitis | 25 (6.7) | 4 (2.4) | 0.040a | |||
5 (3.4) | 20 (8.9) | 0.039a | 1 (1.1) | 3 (3.9) | 0.243 | |
Hyperamylasemia | 52 (14.0) | 13 (7.8) | 0.041a | |||
15 (10.2) | 37 (16.4) | 0.090 | 5 (5.6) | 9 (11.7) | 0.156 | |
Bleeding | 10 (2.7) | 6 (3.6) | 0.568 | |||
2 (1.4) | 8 (3.6) | 0.202 | 2 (2.2) | 4 (5.2) | 0.306 | |
Perforation | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0) | 0.505 | |||
0 (0) | 1 (0.4) | 0.423 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | NA |
- Citation: Han SY, Baek DH, Kim DU, Park CJ, Park YJ, Lee MW, Song GA. Primary needle-knife fistulotomy for preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Importance of the endoscopist’s expertise level. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(17): 4166-4177
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i17/4166.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i17.4166