Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 6, 2021; 9(16): 3895-3907
Published online Jun 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i16.3895
Published online Jun 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i16.3895
Table 4 Diagnostic ability of the four endoscopists for gastric intestinal metaplasia
| Endoscopist | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy |
| Expert Liang | 85% | 80% | 89.5% | 72.7% | 83.3% |
| Expert Xu | 80% | 90% | 94.1% | 69.2% | 83.3% |
| Non-expert Chang | 65% | 80% | 86.7% | 53.3% | 76.7% |
| Non-expert Qu | 75% | 90% | 93.8% | 64.3% | 80% |
- Citation: Song YH, Xu LD, Xing MX, Li KK, Xiao XG, Zhang Y, Li L, Xiao YJ, Qu YL, Wu HL. Comparison of white-light endoscopy, optical-enhanced and acetic-acid magnifying endoscopy for detecting gastric intestinal metaplasia: A randomized trial. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(16): 3895-3907
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i16/3895.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i16.3895