Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2021; 9(14): 3265-3272
Published online May 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i14.3265
Published online May 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i14.3265
Table 4 Comparison of patient mastery between the two groups
Patient mastery | One-to-one education group, n = 49 | Basic nursing group, n = 49 | x2 | P value |
Master | 31 (63.27) | 22 (44.90) | 6.795 | 0.009 |
Basically master | 17 (34.69) | 15 (30.61) | 0.379 | 0.538 |
Never master | 1 (2.04) | 12 (24.49) | 21.903 | 0.001 |
Knowledge mastery rate | 48 (97.96) | 37 (75.51) | 21.903 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Fu XJ, Hu SD, Peng YF, Zhou LY, Shu T, Song DD. Observation of the effect of one-to-one education on high-risk cases of diabetic foot. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(14): 3265-3272
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i14/3265.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i14.3265