Is traumatic meniscal lesion associated with acute fracture morphology changes of tibia plateau? A series of arthroscopic analysis of 67 patients

Table 3 Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval and receiver operating characteristic area associated traumatic meniscal lesions in different groups

Fracture group	Variable	OR	95%CI	ROC area	P value
Unicondylar TPF	FWP	0.95	0.68 -2.54	0.58	0.36
	FSD	2.53	1.02-6.28	0.69	0.03
	FLD	0.42	0.65-1.14	0.44	0.52
	PTS	1.10	0.73-1.27	0.49	0.95
	ARFA	0.07	0.00-0.19	0.71	0.02
Bicondylar TPF	FWP	2.30	1.02-5.65	0.77	0.03
	FSD	2.95	1.07-6.66	0.76	0.03
	FLD	1.15	0.79-1.32	0.52	0.86
	PTS	1.40	0.96-3.66	0.81	0.01
	ARFA	0.13	0.00-0.27	0.51	0.93
Total TPF	FWP	1.51	0.69-1.84	0.63	0.07
	FSD	2.31	1.26-5.63	0.73	0.00
	FLD	0.62	0.59-1.01	0.47	0.73
	PTS	1.18	0.90-1.42	0.59	0.18
	ARFA	0.11	0.01-0.22	0.62	0.09

ARFA: Area ratio of fracture area; FLD: Fracture line distance; FSD: Fragment subsiding distance; FWP: Fragment width of plateau; PTS: Posterior tibial slope; TPF: Tibial plateau fracture.