Removal of biofilm is essential for long-term ventilation tube retention

doi:10.12998/wjcc.v8.i9.1592

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 8, Issue 9

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (7922)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

448

WORD

182

HTML

4123

Figures (1-3)

761

Tables (1-3)

515

Sum=6029

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

676

Download

1216

Sum=1892

May 6, 2020 (publication date) through Feb 21, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (2)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Case Control Study

World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2020; 8(9): 1592-1599
Published online May 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i9.1592

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Retention time of the ventilation tube. The tympanostomy tube retention time of the treatment group was significantly longer than that of the control group. ^aP < 0.01.

Citation: Ma Q, Wang H, Chen ZN, Wu YQ, Yu DZ, Wang PJ, Shi HB, Su KM. Removal of biofilm is essential for long-term ventilation tube retention. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(9): 1592-1599
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i9/1592.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i9.1592