Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2020; 8(9): 1608-1619
Published online May 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i9.1608
Table 7 Analysis of lymph node metastasis according to age using a logistic regression model
Characteristic≤ 60 yr old
> 60 yr old
P valueOR95%CIP valueOR95%CI
Sex
Male1.0001.000
Female0.0660.7620.571-1.0180.5430.9100.670-1.235
Tumour size
≤ 5 cm1.0001.000
> 5 cm0.0010.4520.344-0.5940.0200.7070.528-0.947
Lymphovascular invasion
No1.0001.000
Yes0.0010.3120.239-0.4070.0010.4060.307-0.536
Depth of invasion
Muscularis propria0.0240.1690.036-0.7900.4521.4770.535-4.077
Sub-serosal0.0460.2110.046-0.9750.4441.4810.541-4.056
Serosal exposed0.1220.2980.064-1.3810.3321.6590.597-4.607
Serosal invasion0.3240.4220.076-2.3410.5031.5710.418-5.903
Histology
Tubular adenocarcinoma (well)1.0001.000
Tubular adenocarcinoma (moderate)0.3400.6440.261-1.5890.0880.4650.193-1.121
Tubular adenocarcinoma (poor)0.7880.8850.364-2.1510.0310.3810.158-0.918
Signet ring cell carcinoma0.9090.9470.370-2.4240.1660.4960.184-1.339
Mucinous adenocarcinoma0.4830.6770.228-2.0140.0680.3460.111-1.080