Computed tomography-based score model/nomogram for predicting technical and midterm outcomes in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt treatment for symptomatic portal cavernoma

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses for technical success

Variable	Univariate analysis		Multivariate analysis
	OR (95%CI)	P value	OR (95%CI)	P value
Age	1.16 (0.99-1.35)	0.123
Gender	2.37 (0.42-5.38)	0.076
Etiology of cirrhosis	6.16 (0.23-9.22)	0.065
Manifestation of liver disease
Varices	0.97 (0.12-1.78)	0.068
Ascites	3.68 (1.51-5.49)	0.032
Hepatic hydrothorax	5.24 (0.45-7.22)	0.189
Abdominal pain	3.22 (0.12-7.21)	0.112
Splenectomy	2.22 (0.21-4.36)	0.156
Child-Pugh score	5.70 (1.78-8.92)	0.029
Baseline MELD score	4.36 (0.45-8.31)	0.061
CTPV score	7.70 (1.78-13.92)	0.012	5.56 (3.55-9.67)	0.002

Only variables with a P value < 0.2 in the univariate analysis are shown. Variables selected into the univariate analysis were age, gender, etiology of cirrhosis, manifestation of liver disease, splenectomy, Child-Pugh score, baseline model of end-stage liver diseases score, laboratory tests, and cavernous transformation of the portal vein score. MELD: Model of end-stage liver diseases; CTPV: Cavernous transformation of the portal vein; CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio.