Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 26, 2020; 8(4): 723-735
Published online Feb 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.723
Published online Feb 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.723
Figure 2 Differences in lower esophageal sphincter mean resting pressure, lower esophageal sphincter integrated relaxation pressure, upper esophageal sphincter mean resting pressure, and upper esophageal sphincter residual pressure between pretreatment and posttreatment stages.
Level significance is indicated as follows: aP < 0.05. LES: Lower esophageal sphincter; UES: Upper esophageal sphincter; restP: Mean resting pressure; IRP: Integrated relaxation pressure; RP: Residual pressure.
- Citation: Huang CZ, Huang ZW, Liang HM, Wang ZJ, Guo TT, Chen YP. Upper esophageal sphincter abnormalities on high-resolution esophageal manometry and treatment response of type II achalasia. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(4): 723-735
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i4/723.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.723