Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 26, 2020; 8(4): 723-735
Published online Feb 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.723
Table 5 Comparisons between upper esophageal sphincter abnormal and upper esophageal sphincter normal patients in the lower esophageal sphincter abnormal group
UES abnormal (n = 133) [n (%)]UES normal (n = 155) [n (%)]P value
GenderMale57 (42.86)69 (44.52)0.778
Female76 (57.14)86 (55.48)
Age (yr; mean ± SD)47.74 ± 12.9444.99 ± 12.200.064
HREM results
Mean DCI (mmHg/s/cm; mean ± SD)1099.10 ± 1019.931137.84 ± 1030.130.750
Failed swallow62 (46.62)68 (43.87)0.641
Panesophageal pressurization21 (15.79)18 (11.61)0.303
Early contraction21 (15.79)21 (13.55)0.592
Rapid contraction18 (13.53)19 (12.26)0.747
Small-break76 (57.14)76 (49.03)0.170
Large-break20 (15.04)25 (16.13)0.800
Achalasia13 (9.77)5 (3.23)0.022a
Type I0 (0.00)0 (0.00)-
Type II13 (9.77)4 (2.58)0.010a
Type III0 (0.00)1 (0.65)0.354
Distal esophageal spasm1 (0.80)0 (0.00)0.280
Hypercontractile esophagus0 (0.00)1 (0.65)0.354
Fragmented contraction2 (7.14)22 (14.19)0.728
Normal contraction17 (12.78)119 (76.77)0.189
Weak contraction12 (9.02)9 (5.81)0.296
Failed contraction13 (9.77)12 (7.74)0.542
Symptoms
Dysphagia10 (7.52)9 (5.81)0.560
Heartburn42 (31.58)57 (36.77)0.380
Abdominal pain35 (25.32)41 (26.45)0.990
Chest pain23 (14.84)37 (23.87)0.171
Sour regurgitation66 (42.58)92 (59.35)0.099
Ructus63 (40.65)91 (58.71)0.055
Cough13 (8.39)7 (4.52)0.081
Hiccup9 (5.81)13 (8.39)0.606
Globus hystericus49 (31.61)62 (40.00)0.584
Others58 (43.61)64 (41.29)0.692