Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 26, 2020; 8(4): 723-735
Published online Feb 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.723
Table 4 Comparisons between upper esophageal sphincter abnormal and upper esophageal sphincter normal patients in the lower esophageal sphincter normal group
UES abnormal (n = 101) [n (%)]UES normal (n = 109) [n (%)]P value
GenderMale55 (54.46)56 (51.38)0.656
Female46 (45.54)53 (48.62)
Age (yr; mean ± SD)47.35 ± 13.4042.82 ± 12.080.011a
HREM results
Mean DCI (mmHg/s/cm; mean ± SD)938.30 ± 712.85977.91 ± 728.410.691
Failed swallow44 (43.56)48 (44.04)0.945
Panesophageal pressurization0 (0.00)0 (0.00)-
Early contraction15 (14.85)15 (13.76)0.822
Rapid contraction11 (10.89)9 (8.26)0.517
Small-break69 (68.32)66 (60.55)0.242
Large-break17 (16.83)24 (22.02)0.345
Achalasia0 (0.00)0 (0.00)-
EGJ outflow obstruction0 (0.00)0 (0.00)-
Distal esophageal spasm4 (3.96)2 (1.83)0.357
Hypercontractile esophagus0 (0.00)0 (0.00)-
Fragmented contraction13 (12.87)21 (19.27)0.210
Normal contraction76 (75.25)79 (72.48)0.428
Weak contraction12 (11.88)9 (8.26)0.383
Failed contraction2 (1.98)3 (2.75)0.518
Symptoms
Dysphagia1 (0.99)9 (8.26)0.014a
Heartburn35 (34.65)42 (38.53)0.561
Abdominal pain30 (29.70)35 (32.11)0.707
Chest pain17 (16.83)28 (25.69)0.119
Sour regurgitation60 (59.41)61 (55.96)0.615
Ructus46 (45.54)46 (42.20)0.627
Cough9 (8.91)6 (5.50)0.339
Hiccup8 (7.92)11 (10.09)0.585
Globus hystericus33 (32.67)41 (37.61)0.455
Others46 (45.54)47 (43.12)0.724