Breast non-mass-like lesions on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: Feature analysis, breast image reporting and data system classification assessment

doi:10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.700

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 8, Issue 4

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (8363)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-4) series, Tables (1-6) series.

Item

Count

PDF

510

WORD

202

HTML

4902

Figures (1-4)

433

Tables (1-6)

304

Sum=6351

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

709

Download

1303

Sum=2012

Feb 26, 2020 (publication date) through Oct 21, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (13)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Clin Cases. Feb 26, 2020; 8(4): 700-712
Published online Feb 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.700

Table 2 Clinical information and ultrasonography, and color Doppler flow imaging between benign and malignant non-mass-like lesions

Parameter		Pathology, n (%)		Total	χ²	P value
Parameter		Benign	Malignant	Total	χ²	P value
Age in yr	﹤45	18 (64.29)	9 (39.13)	27 (52.94)	3.207	0.073
Age in yr	≥ 45	10 (35.71)	14 (60.87)	24 (47.06)	3.207	0.073
Palpability	No	19 (67.86)	12 (52.17)	31 (60.78)	1.303	0.254
Palpability	Yes	9 (32.14)	11 (47.83)	20 (39.22)	1.303	0.254
Nipple discharge	No	20 (71.43)	18 (78.26)	38 (74.51)	0.31	0.577
Nipple discharge	Yes	8 (28.57)	5 (21.74)	13 (25.49)	0.31	0.577
Echogenicity	Hypo-echoic	14 (50.00)	13 (56.52)	27 (52.94)	0.216	0.642
Echogenicity	Mixed-echoic	14 (50.00)	10 (43.48)	24 (47.06)	0.216	0.642
Ductal changes	No	17 (60.71)	12 (52.17)	29 (56.86)	0.375	0.54
Ductal changes	Yes	11 (39.29)	11 (47.83)	22 (43.14)	0.375	0.54
Rear echo attenuation	No	25 (89.29)	16 (69.57)	41 (80.39)	1.99	0.158
Rear echo attenuation	Yes	3 (10.71)	7 (30.43)	10 (19.61)	1.99	0.158
Architectural distortion	No	27 (96.43)	17 (73.91)	44 (86.27)	1.043	0.307
Architectural distortion	Yes	1 (3.57)	6 (26.09)	7 (13.73)	1.043	0.307
Microcalcifications	No	24 (85.71)	10 (43.48)	34 (66.67)	10.137	0.001^b
Microcalcifications	Yes	4 (14.29)	13 (56.52)	17 (33.33)	10.137	0.001^b
Axillary lymph node	Normal	26 (92.86)	17 (73.91)	43 (84.31)	1.274	0.237
Axillary lymph node	Abnormal	2 (7.14)	6 (26.09)	8 (15.69)	1.274	0.237
CDFI	Scarce	19 (67.86)	14 (60.87)	33 (64.71)	0.27	0.603
CDFI	Abundant	9 (32.14)	9 (39.13)	18 (35.29)	0.27	0.603

^bP < 0.01. CDFI: Color Doppler flow imaging.

Citation: Xu P, Yang M, Liu Y, Li YP, Zhang H, Shao GR. Breast non-mass-like lesions on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: Feature analysis, breast image reporting and data system classification assessment. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(4): 700-712
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i4/700.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.700