Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2020; 8(24): 6229-6242
Published online Dec 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i24.6229
Published online Dec 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i24.6229
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Variable | TLN ≥ 12 (group A, n = 177) | TLN < 12 (group B, n = 54) | P value |
Sex (n, %) | 0.591 | ||
Male | 121 (68.4) | 39 (72.2) | |
Female | 56 (31.6) | 15 (27.8) | |
Age (yr) | 60 (51-65) | 59.5 (52.75-66.5) | 0.544 |
ASA score (n, %) | 0.488 | ||
1 | 5 (2.8) | 2 (3.7) | |
2 | 139 (78.6) | 39 (72.2) | |
3 | 33 (18.6) | 13 (24.1) | |
BMI (kg/m2) | 23.8 (21.9-26.4) | 23.4 (21.5-25.2) | 0.423 |
cT, n (%) | 0.975 | ||
2 | 2 (1.1) | 0 (0) | |
3 | 137 (77.4) | 43 (79.6) | |
4 | 38 (21.5) | 11 (20.4) | |
cN, n (%) | 0.109 | ||
0 | 44 (24.9) | 18 (33.3) | |
1 | 91 (51.4) | 28 (51.9) | |
2 | 42 (23.7) | 8 (14.8) | |
Preoperative CEA (μg/L) | 2.99 (1.55-5.57) | 3 (1.68-5.57) | 0.729 |
ypT, n (%) | 0.140 | ||
0 | 26 (14.7) | 14 (25.9) | |
1 | 4 (2.3) | 1 (1.9) | |
2 | 37 (20.9) | 11 (20.4) | |
3 | 97 (54.8) | 24 (44.4) | |
4 | 13 (7.3) | 4 (7.4) | |
ypN, n (%) | 0.026 | ||
0 | 90 (50.8) | 38 (70.4) | |
1 | 64 (36.2) | 10 (18.5) | |
2 | 23 (13) | 6 (11.1) | |
TRG, n (%) | 0.312 | ||
0 | 14 (7.9) | 4 (7.4) | |
1 | 26 (14.7) | 7 (13) | |
2 | 78 (44.1) | 22 (40.7) | |
3 | 33 (18.6) | 7 (13) | |
4 | 26 (14.7) | 14 (25.9) | |
No downstaging, n (%) | 98 (55.4) | 20 (37) | 0.019 |
Downstaging, n (%) | 56 (31.6) | 21 (38.9) | 0.324 |
pCR, n (%) | 26 (14.7) | 14 (25.9) | 0.057 |
Positive lymph nodes, n (%) | 0 (0-1) | 0 (0-0) | 0.003 |
LNR | 0 (0-0.68) | 0 (0-0) | 0.012 |
Radiotherapy dose, n (%) | 0.557 | ||
45-50.4 Gy/28 F | 125 (70.6) | 39 (72.2) | |
< 45 Gy/25 F | 34 (19.2) | 5 (9.3) | |
25 Gy/5 F | 18 (10.2) | 10 (18.5) | |
Preoperative concurrent chemotherapy regimen, n (%) | 0.376 | ||
Capecitabine+ oxaliplatin | 54 (30.5) | 17 (31.5) | |
Capecitabine, oral | 108 (61) | 37 (68.5) | |
Fluorouracil union | 15 (8.5) | 0 (0) | |
Tumor location, DAV (cm) | 5 (3-7) | 5 (3-7) | 0.605 |
Interval, w (%) | 8 (6.5-11) | 10 (8-16) | 0.001 |
Surgical procedure | 0.018 | ||
Miles (n, %) | 74 (41.8) | 26 (48.2) | |
Dixon (n, %) | 93 (52.5) | 20 (37) | |
Hartmann (n, %) | 10 (5.6) | 8 (14.8) | |
LLND (n, %) | 20 (11.3) | 1 (1.9) | 0.035 |
Multivisceral resection (n, %) | 10 (5.6) | 2 (3.7) | 0.574 |
PNI (n, %) | 0.819 | ||
Yes | 42 (23.7) | 12 (22.2) | |
No | 135 (76.3) | 42 (77.8) | |
Intravascular tumor embolus (n, %) | 0.463 | ||
Yes | 23 (13) | 5 (9.3) | |
No | 154 (87) | 49 (90.7) | |
Degree of differentiation, n (%) | 0.367 | ||
Low and low-middle grades | 18 (10.2) | 9 (16.7) | |
Middle, high-middle, and high grades | 132 (74.6) | 43 (79.6) | |
Signet-ring and mucinous adenocarcinoma | 4 (2.3) | 2 (3.7) |
- Citation: Mei SW, Liu Z, Wang Z, Pei W, Wei FZ, Chen JN, Wang ZJ, Shen HY, Li J, Zhao FQ, Wang XS, Liu Q. Impact factors of lymph node retrieval on survival in locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant therapy. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(24): 6229-6242
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i24/6229.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i24.6229