Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 6, 2020; 8(23): 5894-5901
Published online Dec 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5894
Published online Dec 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5894
Table 2 Comparison of diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value between magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography examinations
| Examination method | Sensitivity(%) | Specificity (%) | Positive predictive value (%) | Negative predictive value (%) |
| CT | 47.50 (19/40) | 83.33 (35/42) | 73.08 (19/26) | 62.50 (39/56) |
| MRI | 92.50 (37/40) | 95.24 (40/42) | 94.87 (37/39) | 93.02 (40/43) |
| χ2 | 48.214 | 7.414 | 17.642 | 26.931 |
| P value | 0.001 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Gu L, Yang XL, Yin HK, Lu ZH, Geng CJ. Application value analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the diagnosis of intracranial infection after craniocerebral surgery. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(23): 5894-5901
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i23/5894.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5894