Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2020; 8(22): 5589-5602
Published online Nov 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5589
Published online Nov 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5589
Table 4 Sensitivity analysis eliminating studies one by one
Ref. | Kappa value (95%CI) | I2 (95%CI), % | P value |
Chen et al[25] | 0.75 (0.62; 0.84) | 92.42 (87.07; 95.57) | < 0.01 |
Schellhaas et al[20] | 0.79 (0.71; 0.85) | 89.44 (80.83; 94.22) | < 0.01 |
Ling et al[28] | 0.77 (0.67; 0.84) | 92.30 (86.72; 95.58) | < 0.01 |
Liu et al[26] | 0.78 (0.69; 0.85) | 91.44 (84.80; 95.13) | < 0.01 |
Zhou et al[27] | 0.74 (0.63; 0.82) | 89.78 (81.61; 94.36) | < 0.01 |
Tan et al[21] | 0.73 (0.62; 0.80) | 90.21 (82.51; 94.60) | < 0.01 |
Wang et al[6] | 0.76 (0.64; 0.85) | 92.41 (86.90; 95.59] | < 0.01 |
Cui et al1 | 0.77 (0.67; 0.85) | 92.04 (86.02; 95.43) | < 0.01 |
- Citation: Li J, Chen M, Wang ZJ, Li SG, Jiang M, Shi L, Cao CL, Sang T, Cui XW, Dietrich CF. Interobserver agreement for contrast-enhanced ultrasound of liver imaging reporting and data system: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(22): 5589-5602
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i22/5589.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5589