Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2020; 8(22): 5589-5602
Published online Nov 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5589
Published online Nov 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5589
Ref. | Kappa value (95%CI) | Weight in fixed model, % | Weight in random model, % |
Chen et al[25] | 0.81 (0.77, 0.84) | 31.40 | 14.00 |
Schellhaas et al[20] | 0.39 (0.14, 0.59) | 3.80 | 11.40 |
Ling et al[28] | 0.69 (0.52, 0.81) | 3.90 | 11.40 |
Liu et al[26] | 0.61 (0.45, 0.73) | 5.80 | 12.30 |
Zhou et al[27] | 0.87 (0.84, 0.90) | 19.90 | 13.80 |
Tan et al[21] | 0.94 (0.89, 0.97) | 3.20 | 10.90 |
Wang et al[6] | 0.77 (0.72, 0.81) | 26.00 | 13.90 |
Cui et al1 | 0.67 (0.53, 0.77) | 6.00 | 12.30 |
- Citation: Li J, Chen M, Wang ZJ, Li SG, Jiang M, Shi L, Cao CL, Sang T, Cui XW, Dietrich CF. Interobserver agreement for contrast-enhanced ultrasound of liver imaging reporting and data system: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(22): 5589-5602
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i22/5589.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5589