Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2020; 8(21): 5284-5295
Published online Nov 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i21.5284
Published online Nov 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i21.5284
Table 4 Effects, outcomes, and risk factors of anterior bone loss
Ref. | Radiological effects | Clinical effects | Treatment | Potential risk factors |
Ren et al[22] | Grade 4 HO in 1 patient with > 2 mm ABL distance, grade 2 HO in 1 patient; only 3 patients had HO in this study | No effect | Monitored | Micromovement of implant |
Hacker et al[23] | Kyphosis of shell angle and FSU angle; Implant subsidence | Recurrent neck and arm pain persisting 52 mo postop | Revision fusion surgery at index and lower adjacent level | Low virulence bacterial infection of endplates at arthroplasty level |
Kim et al[24] | Ossification of ALL at the inferior adjacent level in 1 patient | No effect | Monitored | Stress shielding; Friction and wear debris between the anterior flange and vertebra (less likely) |
Heo et al[25] | No effect | Grade 3 ABL had significantly higher mean VAS score for neck pain at 6 mo (5.3 vs 1.8) and 12 mo (4.7 vs 1.8) postop | Monitored | Stress shielding;good motion function of implants |
Kieser et al[26] | A significant relationship with HO | A lower NDI score 5 yr postop (P < 0.1) | Not reported | More operative levels; less of traction of ALL; surgical exposure |
Kieser et al[27] | Exposure or subsidence of implant in severe ABL | No effect | Monitored | Grade 1-2: direct anterior vertebral injury including heat necrosis or resected ALL; Grade 3-4: avascular necrosis caused by injury to nutrient vessels |
- Citation: Wang XF, Meng Y, Liu H, Hong Y, Wang BY. Anterior bone loss after cervical disc replacement: A systematic review. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(21): 5284-5295
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i21/5284.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i21.5284