Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2020; 8(21): 5235-5249
Published online Nov 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i21.5235
Table 1 Features of the studies included in this analysis
Ref.
Design
Patient type
Treatments
N
M/F
Age, yr, range (mean)
BMI, kg/m2
Duration
Yin et al[23], 2000 Randomized, OLNAFLD + diabetesPPC + ADs vs ADs12573/5242–78 (59)N/A84 d
Poongothai et al[25], 2005Prospective, OLNAFLD + type 2 diabetesPPC + ADs2211/11(41)28.26 mo
Arvind et al[26], 2006Prospective, non-randomized, DBNAFLD + diabetes or obesityPPC vs ursodeoxycholic acid40NANANA3 mo
Sun et al[21], 2008Prospective, randomized, OLNAFLD + type 2 diabetesPPC + metformin vs metformin7440/3428–60 (42)NA12 wk
Wu et al[22], 2009Prospective, randomized, OLNAFLD + type 2 diabetesPPC + usual care vs usual care10064/36(55)NA1 mo
Li et al[18], 2013Prospective, randomized, OLNAFLD + diabetesPPC + metformin vs metformin8657/29(51)NA6 wk
Sas et al[19], 2013Prospective, randomized, OLNASH + type 2 diabetesPPC + metformin vs metformin189NANANA6 mo
Dajani et al[24], 2015Prospective, OLNAFLD ± type 2 diabetes or hyperlipidemiaEssential phospholipid324176/14821–69 (43.5)29.372 wk
Shan et al[20], 2015Prospective, randomized, OLNASH + obesityPPC vs Chinese medicine (Quzhi hepatoprotection recipe)6038/2218-55 (41.3)NA8 wk
Li et al[17], 2017Prospective, randomized, OLNAFLD + diabetesPPC + Chinese medicine (Shugan Huazhuo recipe) vs PPC8044/3629-63 (48)NA3 mo