Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 26, 2020; 8(20): 4753-4762
Published online Oct 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4753
Published online Oct 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4753
Figure 2 Key operative steps in representative cases of the retroperitoneal group (A-E) and the transperitoneal group (F-J).
In the upper row: (A) The isthmus (i) was supplied by an aberrant artery (a) from the abdominal aorta (aa). (B) The isthmus was completely isolated with a stapler. (C) The isthmus (i) was moved back to expose the ureter (u). (D) At the guideline of the ureter (u), the pelvis (p) was exposed and dissected to remove the stone. (E) A Double-J stent was inserted into the ureter (u). In the bottom row: (F) The isthmus (i) was exposed. (G) Anastomosis of the isthmus (i). (H) The isthmus was dissected by Mayo scissors. (I) The pelvis (p) was exposed and dissected to remove the stone. (J) A Double-J stent was inserted into the ureter (u).
- Citation: Chen X, Wang Y, Gao L, Song J, Wang JY, Wang DD, Ma JX, Zhang ZQ, Bi LK, Xie DD, Yu DX. Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy of 20-40 mm renal stones within horseshoe kidneys. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(20): 4753-4762
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i20/4753.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4753