Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 26, 2020; 8(20): 4708-4718
Published online Oct 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4708
Table 1 Patient and lesion characteristics and procedure-related outcomes
Patient No.SexAgeAbdominal pain episodes (times)Amylase/lipase (U/L)Endoscopic ultrasonography findings
Echogenicity, homogeneitySize change (mm)Layer
1F43> 10Not doneHypoechoic, homogeneous, cystic foci.10-182, 3, 4
2M283236/361Hypoechoic, heterogeneous, cystic foci.17-502, 3, 4
3F373Not doneHypoechoic, homogeneous, cystic foci.16.9-452, 3, 4
4F322294/26Hypoechoic, homogeneous, cystic foci.15-352, 3, 4
5M28> 10120/32Hypoechoic, homogeneous, cystic foci.15-152, 3, 4
CT findings at the time of diagnosisPathological diagnosisProcedure time (min)ESD hospitalization (d)Follow-up (mon)
Ovoid-shaped lesion with a lobulating contour in the gastric antrumHeterotopic pancreas15333
Enhancing mass-like and cystic lesions in the gastric antrumHeterotopic pancreas120460
Subepithelial mass with an internal low-density portion in the gastric antrumCalcification and foreign body reaction27359
Soft tissue lesion containing a cystic portion and tiny calcification in the gastric antrumCalcification and foreign body reaction17245
Enhancing mass-like lesion in the gastric antrumHeterotopic pancreas26246