Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2020; 8(19): 4311-4319
Published online Oct 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4311
Published online Oct 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4311
Characteristics | TAMIS, n = 44 | EMR, n = 53 | P value |
Age, yr | 64.25 ± 10.85 | 60.70 ± 10.38 | 0.104 |
Gender, n (%) | 0.383 | ||
Male | 21 (47.7) | 30 (56.6) | |
Female | 23 (52.3) | 23 (44.4) | |
BMI, kg/m2 | 22.88 ± 2.46 | 22.43 ± 1.98 | 0.322 |
Tumor size, cm | 1.47 ± 0.96 | 1.14 ± 0.53 | 0.033 |
Benign | 1.46 ± 1.02 | 1.06 ± 0.50 | 0.024 |
Carcinoid | 1.52 ± 0.72 | 1.64 ± 0.45 | 0.702 |
Distance from the anal verge, cm | 7.39 ± 1.86 | 8.83 ± 2.95 | 0.006 |
Final pathology, n (%)1 | 0.220 | ||
Benign | 34 (77.3) | 46 (86.8) | |
Carcinoid | 10 (22.7) | 7 (13.2) |
- Citation: Shen JM, Zhao JY, Ye T, Gong LF, Wang HP, Chen WJ, Cai YK. Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(19): 4311-4319
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i19/4311.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4311