Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2020; 8(19): 4286-4302
Published online Oct 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4286
Published online Oct 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4286
Surrounding materials | Available | Cost | Time | Durability and resusable | Infection | Coloring | Reality of the image | Reality of resistance | Need for additives |
Gelatin based | Easy | More cheaper | Need more time (usually need refrigeration) | Weak | Relatively vulnerable | Easy | Very good | Relatively unrealistic | Often needed |
Approximately 2–3 h and can take up to 5 h | |||||||||
Agar based | Easy | Cheap | Relatively less time | Good | Relatively vulnerable | Easy | Good | Relatively unrealistic | Rarely needed |
Ballistics gel based | Not difficult | Relatively expensive | Short preparation time (about 1 h) | Excellent | Resistant | Not difficult | NA | Great realism | Usually not required |
- Citation: Shin KC, Ha YR, Lee SJ, Ahn JH. Review of simulation model for education of point-of-care ultrasound using easy-to-make tools. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(19): 4286-4302
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i19/4286.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4286