Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2020; 8(18): 4043-4050
Published online Sep 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.4043
Published online Sep 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.4043
Table 3 Comparison of complications between the two groups, n (%)
| Complication | Needle free sling group (n = 44) | Middle urethra suspension group (n = 44) | χ2 | P value |
| Infection | 1 (2.27) | 3 (6.82) | 2.386 | 0.122 |
| Hematoma | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.27) | 2.296 | 0.130 |
| Urinary retention | 1 (2.27) | 2 (4.55) | 0.789 | 0.374 |
| Incidence of complications | 2 (4.55) | 6 (13.64) | 4.997 | 0.025 |
- Citation: Chen YG, Zhang YG, Zhang W, Li X, Wang X. Clinical value of needleless sling in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(18): 4043-4050
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i18/4043.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.4043