Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2020; 8(18): 4043-4050
Published online Sep 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.4043
Published online Sep 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.4043
Table 2 Comparison of therapeutic effect between the two groups, n (%)
| Curative effect | Needle free sling group (n = 44) | Middle urethra suspension group (n = 44) | χ2 | P value |
| Cure | 31 (70.45) | 29 (65.91) | 0.475 | 0.491 |
| Effective | 12 (27.27) | 13 (29.55) | 0.128 | 0.721 |
| Invalid | 1 (2.27) | 2 (4.55) | 0.789 | 0.374 |
| Total clinical effective rate | 43 (97.73) | 42 (95.45) | 0.789 | 0.374 |
- Citation: Chen YG, Zhang YG, Zhang W, Li X, Wang X. Clinical value of needleless sling in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(18): 4043-4050
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i18/4043.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.4043