Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2020; 8(16): 3503-3514
Published online Aug 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3503
Published online Aug 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3503
Achieved marked effect | Cumulative percentage | Did not achieve significant results | |||
n | Percentage (%) | n | Percentage (%) | ||
1 time | 3 | 2.86 | 2.86 | 102 | 97.14 |
2 times | 6 | 5.88 | 8.57 | 96 | 94.12 |
3 times | 43 | 44.79 | 49.52 | 53 | 55.21 |
4 times | 5 | 9.43 | 54.29 | 48 | 90.57 |
5 times | 18 | 37.50 | 71.43 | 30 | 62.50 |
6 times | 17 | 56.67 | 87.62 | 13 | 43.33 |
- Citation: Liu L, Liu QW, Wu XD, Liu SY, Cao HJ, Hong YT, Qin HY. Follow-up study on symptom distress in esophageal cancer patients undergoing repeated dilation. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(16): 3503-3514
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i16/3503.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3503