Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2020; 8(16): 3493-3502
Published online Aug 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3493
Published online Aug 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3493
Table 5 Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of miR-1271 and glypican-3 alone and jointly for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (%)
| Items | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | RR (95%CI) |
| GPC3 | 68.9 | 86.0 | 75.3 | 0.926 (0.561-1.471) |
| miR-1271 | 76.0 | 72.8 | 76.5 | 0.925 (0.374-1.482) |
| GPC3 + miR-1271 | 94.7 | 65.0 | 80.3 | 0.931 (0.537-1.312) |
- Citation: Guo Z, Wang J, Li L, Liu R, Fang J, Tie B. Value of miR-1271 and glypican-3 in evaluating the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(16): 3493-3502
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i16/3493.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3493