Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2020; 8(16): 3493-3502
Published online Aug 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3493
Published online Aug 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3493
Table 4 Comparison of serum glypican-3 and miR-1271 levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Group | Number of cases | Glypican-3 | t | P value | miR-1271 | t | P value |
Group 1 | 7.41 | < 0.05 | 18.06 | < 0.05 | |||
Health group | 162 | 0.74 ± 0.29 | 5.48 ± 1.79 | ||||
Cancer group | 162 | 8.87 ± 3.73 | 1.25 ± 0.68 | ||||
Group 2 | 18.06 | < 0.05 | 18.06 | < 0.05 | |||
Before treatment | 162 | 8.87 ± 3.73 | 1.25 ± 0.68 | ||||
After treatment | 162 | 2.46 ± 1.69 | 4.64 ± 2.13 | ||||
Group 3 | 7.6 | < 0.05 | 4.17 | < 0.05 | |||
Remission group | 112 | 6.79 ± 5.32 | 4.96 ± 2.28 | ||||
Recurrent group | 50 | 8.74 ± 2.40 | 3.41 ± 1.96 |
- Citation: Guo Z, Wang J, Li L, Liu R, Fang J, Tie B. Value of miR-1271 and glypican-3 in evaluating the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(16): 3493-3502
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i16/3493.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3493