Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2020; 8(16): 3483-3492
Published online Aug 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3483
Table 2 Comparison of basic data and labor management between the two groups
Pregnancy outcome
χ2P value
Control group (vaginal delivery)
Observation group (conversion to cesarean section)
FrequencyPercentFrequencyPercent
Age (yr)
≤ 20340.430.30.5030.478
20-35752392.2101594.3
≥ 356077.4585.46.0050.014
Neonatal weight (g)
< 2500370.460.60.3810.537
2500-4000744491.292085.5
≥ 40006838.415013.936.1860.000
Gestational age (wk)
< 37540.750.60.3030.582
37-41729889.487488.2
≥ 418129.919711.567.9430.000
Use of uterine contraction drugs
Yes257831.644744.342.8730. 000
No558668.455955.7
Parity
Primipara664281.4104096.7158.6950. 000
Multipara152218.6363.3
Fever during labor
Yes3654.519117.8296.4790. 000
No779995.588582.2
Labor analgesia
Yes368545.141538.616.6170. 000
No447954.966161.4
Scarred uterus
Yes230.350.51.0530.305
No814199.7107199.5
Abnormal amniotic fluid (meconium stained or bloody)
Yes215826.4290270.1310.717
No600673.678673
Prolonged labor/active stage retention
Yes3444.2565.22.2540.133
No782095.8102094.8
Prolonged pregnancy
Yes70.110.10.0060.94
No815799.9107599.9