Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2020; 8(15): 3259-3266
Published online Aug 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i15.3259
Published online Aug 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i15.3259
Variables | FAS analysis | PPS analysis | ||||
n (missing)1 | Normal | Rate (95%CI) | n (missing)1 | Normal | Rate (95%CI) | |
Percentage of patients who achieved regular MC after | 89 (18) | 72 | 80.9 (71.2-88.5) | 65 (10) | 62 | 95.4 (87.1-99.0) |
Three cycles of dydrogesterone treatment | ||||||
Subgroups | ||||||
Patients with menstrual cycle > 35 d | 63 (25) | 61 | 96.8 (89.0-99.6) | 63 (1) | 61 | 96.8 (89.0-99.6) |
Patients with menstrual period > 8 d | 8 (3) | 7 | 87.5 (47.3-99.7) | 8 (0) | 7 | 87.5 (47.3-99.7) |
After cycle 1 treatment of dydrogesterone | 75 (32) | 71 | 94.7 (86.9-98.5) | 64 (11) | 61 | 95.3 (86.9-99.0) |
After cycle 2 treatment of dydrogesterone | 65 (42) | 59 | 90.8 (81.0-96.5) | 64 (11) | 59 | 92.1 (82.7-97.4) |
- Citation: Wang L, Guan HY, Xia HX, Chen XY, Zhang W. Dydrogesterone treatment for menstrual-cycle regularization in abnormal uterine bleeding – ovulation dysfunction patients. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(15): 3259-3266
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i15/3259.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i15.3259