Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2020; 8(14): 2942-2949
Published online Jul 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i14.2942
Published online Jul 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i14.2942
Table 2 Comparison of the postoperative recovery rate between the two groups of patients, n (%)
| Group | Number of cases | Excellent | Good | Fair | Difference | Excellent rate |
| Observation group | 48 | 40 (83.33) | 5 (10.42) | 3 (6.25) | 0 (0.00) | 45 (93.75) |
| Control group | 48 | 37 (77.08) | 7 (14.58) | 4 (8.33) | 0 (0.00) | 44 (91.67) |
| χ² | 0.154 | |||||
| P value | 0.695 |
- Citation: Pang JY, Tan F, Chen WW, Li CH, Dou SP, Guo JR, Zhao LY. Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy for single-segment lumbar disc herniation. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(14): 2942-2949
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i14/2942.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i14.2942