Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2020; 8(14): 2942-2949
Published online Jul 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i14.2942
Published online Jul 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i14.2942
Table 1 Comparison of the surgical indicators in the two groups of patients (mean ± SD)
| Group | Number of cases | Operation time (min) | Intraoperative blood loss (mL) | Incision length (mm) | Bed time after operation (d) | Hospital stay (d) |
| Observation group | 48 | 72.64 ± 6.32 | 35.42 ± 8.16 | 2.25 ± 0.34 | 3.36 ± 2.18 | 7.25 ± 3.64 |
| Control group | 48 | 52.87 ± 4.34 | 60.25 ± 11.24 | 6.82 ± 0.41 | 4.79 ± 1.86 | 10.86 ± 4.25 |
| t | 17.866 | 12.385 | 59.444 | 3.457 | 4.469 | |
| P value | 0.00 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Pang JY, Tan F, Chen WW, Li CH, Dou SP, Guo JR, Zhao LY. Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy for single-segment lumbar disc herniation. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(14): 2942-2949
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i14/2942.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i14.2942