Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2020; 8(12): 2408-2424
Published online Jun 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i12.2408
Table 2 Average values in millimeters for the right hemidiaphragm thickness
Body positionThickness at the end of expiration
Thickness at deep inspiration
Ratio
MenWomenMenWomenMenWomen
Cardenas et al[13], (n = 64)Semi-recumbent1.9 ± 0.3, LLN = 1.251.79 ± 0.3, LLN = 1.235.6 ± 0.9 (TLC), LLN = 3.834.8 ± 1 (TLC), LLN = 2.91TF = 204% ± 62%, LLN = 80%TF = 170% ± 44%, LLN = 82%
Boon et al[43], (n = 150)Supine3.8 ± 1.5 (FRC), LLN = 1.72.7 ± 1 (FRC), LLN=1.5TR = 1.7 ± 1.9, LLN = 1.2TR = 1.7 ± 1.9, LLN = 1.3
Ueki et al[5], (n = 13)Sitting1.7 ± 0.2 (FRC), 1.6 ± 0.2 (RV)4.4 ± 1.4 (max insp. Pressure)Thickness pimax/FRC = 2.6 ± 0.7 (2-3.9)
Zhu et al[37], (n = 60)Supine1.6 ± 0.4 (FRC) (1.5-1.8)3.1 ± 0.8 (TLC) (3-3.3)TR = 1.99 ± 0.48 (1.81-2.04)
Baria et al[38], (n = 150)Supine3.2 ± 1.3 (1.3-7.3)TR = 1.8 ± 0.5 (1.2-3.9)
Scarlata et al[31], (n = 66)Recumbent1.8 ± 0.4 (FRC)2.6 ± 0.5 (TLC)TR = 1.5 ± 0.24
Carrillo-Esper et al[34], (n = 109)Supine1.9 ± 0.4 (FRC)1.4 ± 0.3 (FRC)TR = 1.7 ± 1.9TR = 1.7 ± 1.9
Gottesman et al[33], (n = 15)Standing2.8 ± 0.4 (FRC)TF = 37% ± 9% (21-57)
Brown et al[40], (n = 45)Supine, seated, standing2.2 (2.1-2.4) (FRC), 2.4 (2.3-2.6) (FRC), 2.5 (2.3-2.8) (FRC)3.5 (3.4-3.7) TLC, 4.6 (4.4-4.8) TLC, 6.5 (6.1-6.9) TLCTF = 65% (61-69), TF = 97% (83-110), TF = 174% (151-197)
Kim et al[39], (n = 49)Supine2.1 ± 0.5 (FRC)6.5 ± 1.4 (TLC)4.4 ± 1.2 (TLC-FRC)