Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 6, 2020; 8(11): 2162-2172
Published online Jun 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i11.2162
Table 1 Comparison of liver transplantation and chronic liver disease groups in terms of demografic and social parameters, n (%)
ParametersLT groupCLD groupTotalP value
Gender0.2481
Male57 (62.6)51 (54.3)108 (58.4)
Female34 (37.4)43 (45.7)77 (41.6)
Children0.0831
One7 (7.8)13 (13.8)20 (10.9)
Two23 (25.6)23 (24.5)46 (25.0)
Three18 (20.0)29 (30.9)47 (25.5)
Four or More42 (46.7)29 (30.9)71 (38.6)
Career< 0.0012
Employed20 (22.0)50 (53.2)70 (37.8)
Unemployed69 (75.8)42 (44.7)111 (60.0)
Retired2 (2.2)2 (2.1)4 (2.2)
Monthly income0.0161
Low (< 1000)23 (25.3)25 (26.6)48 (25.9)
Middle (1000-3000)64 (70.3)53 (56.4)117 (63.2)
High (> 3000)4 (4.4)16 (17.0)20 (10.8)
Residence place0.6701
Village21 (23.1)21 (22.3)42 (22.7)
Town26 (28.6)22 (23.4)48 (25.9)
City center44 (48.4)51 (54.3)95 (51.4)
Educational level0.0411
Elementary school58 (63.7)45 (47.9)103 (55.7)
Middle school10 (11.0)20 (21.3)30 (16.2)
High school17 (18.7)15 (16.0)32 (17.3)
University6 (6.6)14 (14.9)20 (10.8)
House where parents live0.5551
Rental59 (64.8)57 (60.6)116 (62.7)
Owner32 (35.2)37 (39.4)69 (37.3)
Social assurance0.9201
Yes75 (82.4)78 (83.0)153 (82.7)
No16 (17.6)16 (17.0)32 (17.3)