Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 26, 2019; 7(8): 972-983
Published online Apr 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i8.972
Published online Apr 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i8.972
Table 3 Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid enhanced scan manifestations of hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma
Items | Cases |
Magnetic resonance imaging | |
T1WI | |
Low, slightly low signal/equisignal/high signal | 107/1/1 |
Slightly uniform/non-uniform | 13/26 |
T2WI | |
Slightly high signal/high signal | 39/70 |
Slightly uniform/non-uniform | 3/29 |
DWI | |
Slightly high signal/high signal | 13/51 |
Slightly uniform/non-uniform | 4/15 |
Gd-EOB-DTPA | |
Arterial phase | |
Homogeneous enhancement/heterogeneous enhancement | 29/21 |
Obvious enhancement/Medium enhancement | 47/7 |
Portal phase | |
Continuous enhancement/enhancement weakened | 22/29 |
Delayed phase | |
Continuous enhancement/enhancement weakened | 1/2 |
- Citation: Mao JX, Teng F, Liu C, Yuan H, Sun KY, Zou Y, Dong JY, Ji JS, Dong JF, Fu H, Ding GS, Guo WY. Two case reports and literature review for hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma: Pitfall of misdiagnosis. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(8): 972-983
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v7/i8/972.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i8.972