Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 26, 2019; 7(8): 972-983
Published online Apr 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i8.972
Published online Apr 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i8.972
Table 2 Preoperative computed tomography manifestations of hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma
| Items | Cases |
| Computed tomography | |
| Plain scan phase | |
| Uniformity (uniform/non-uniform) | 15/24 |
| Density (low density/equidensity) | 63/9 |
| Arterial phase (Obvious uniform enhancement/apparent or moderate non-uniform enhancement) | 54/53 |
| Portal phase (obvious enhancement/enhancement reduction) | 33/42 |
| Delayed phase (sustained moderate enhancement/enhancement reduction) | 23/30 |
| Characteristic manifestations | |
| Central vessel sign (Y/N) | 119/38 |
| Early drainage veins (Y/N) | 75/47 |
| Enhancement mode (fast wash-in and fast wash-out/fast wash-in and slow wash-out/delayed enhancement) | 67/83/15 |
| Pseudocapsule (Y/N) | 65/73 |
- Citation: Mao JX, Teng F, Liu C, Yuan H, Sun KY, Zou Y, Dong JY, Ji JS, Dong JF, Fu H, Ding GS, Guo WY. Two case reports and literature review for hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma: Pitfall of misdiagnosis. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(8): 972-983
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v7/i8/972.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i8.972