Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 26, 2019; 7(8): 972-983
Published online Apr 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i8.972
Published online Apr 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i8.972
Table 1 Ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma
| Items | Cases |
| Ultrasound | |
| Echo (low/mixed/high) | 54/8/24 |
| Internal uniformity (heterogeneity/homogeneity) | 37/38 |
| Boundary (clear/indistinct) | 55/5 |
| Hypoechoic halo (Y/N) | 13/34 |
| Blood supply (rich/abundant/rare) | 22/6/7 |
| Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography | |
| Arterial phase (high/middle/low) | 15/0/0 |
| Portal phase (high or slightly high/middle/low or slightly low) | 4/8/3 |
| Delay phase (high or slightly high/middle/low or slightly low) | 3/7/5 |
- Citation: Mao JX, Teng F, Liu C, Yuan H, Sun KY, Zou Y, Dong JY, Ji JS, Dong JF, Fu H, Ding GS, Guo WY. Two case reports and literature review for hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma: Pitfall of misdiagnosis. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(8): 972-983
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v7/i8/972.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i8.972