Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 6, 2019; 7(7): 830-838
Published online Apr 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i7.830
Published online Apr 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i7.830
Surgical method | Maximum diameter | Volume | Pathological grade | Operation data | Follow-up time (mo) | Medication time (mo) | Liquefaction | Ulcer bleeding |
Endoscopy group | 5 | 37.5 | Low risk | 2012/3/26 | 41 | No | No | No |
3 | 18.75 | Low risk | 2017/10/27 | 6 | No | No | No | |
Surgery group | 5 | 56.25 | Low risk | 2014/12/9 | 34 | No | No | Yes |
4 | 40 | Moderate risk | 2017/2/11 | 17 | No | Yes | No | |
7 | 147 | High risk | 2015/1/14 | 12 | 12 | No | Yes | |
7.5 | 56.25 | High risk | 2016/6/1 | 21 | 21 | Yes | Unknown | |
8 | 96 | High risk | 2017/12/1 | 6 | 6 | Yes | Yes | |
14 | 700 | High risk | 2015/8/7 | 35 | No | Yes | Yes | |
18.5 | 1572.5 | High risk | 2015/4/17 | 24 | 18 | Yes | Unknown | |
20 | 3840 | High risk | 2016/2/23 | 11 | 6 | Yes | Unknown |
- Citation: Xiang YY, Li YY, Ye L, Zhu Y, Zhou XJ, Chen YX, Li GH. Clinical evaluation of endoscopic resection for treatment of large gastric stromal tumors. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(7): 830-838
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v7/i7/830.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i7.830